CONTAP-694455: Optimize SpinCE for GDD and non-GDD enabled copy operations
Issue
- When SpinCE is used for copy operations (especially with internode copies), performance may be significantly slower compared to copies with VAAI disabled.
- This behavior has been observed during copies between node-local NFSv4 FlexGroup volumes.
- Large, mostly empty files (e.g., multi-terabyte virtual disks with minimal actual data) can highlight the performance gap more prominently.
- In some cases, copies with VAAI disabled completes such copies substantially faster, while SpinCE may take many times longer.
- Performance analysis during slower SpinCE operations has shown elevated WAFL suspend activity, including events such as:
SERIAL_FRANGE_MAX_TRIES
WIL_WAIT_FRANGE
- Increased WAFL suspend counts suggest inefficiencies in how SpinCE handles certain write or file layout patterns during copy operations.
- Known architectural or implementation challenges (e.g., handling of sparse or disjoint writes) may contribute to the discrepancy in performance.
- These challenges are not limited to a single workload and may affect any environment with similar characteristics (e.g., sparse large files, specific copy paths, or offload behavior).
- Overall, there is an opportunity to optimize and modernize SpinCE to improve efficiency and align performance more closely with alternative data movement methods.
