Skip to main content
NetApp Knowledge Base

Disk count of first plex show different number with second plex when  simulate adding disks to an existing  mirrored aggregate

Views:
342
Visibility:
Public
Votes:
0
Category:
fas-systems
Specialty:
MetroCluster
Last Updated:

Applies to

ONTAP 9.x

Issue

When performing the command "storage aggregate add-disks -aggregate -simulate" to add disks to an existing mirrored aggregate, disk count of the first plex show different numbers with the second plex.

Example:

The below command is adding 11 disks to an existing aggregate "aggr_ssd" :

Cluster::> storage aggregate add-disks -aggregate aggr_ssd -disklist 1.31.12,1.31.13,1.31.14,1.31.15,1.31.16,1.31.17,1.31.18,1.31.19,1.31.20,1.31.21,1.31.22 -raidgroup rg0 -mirror-disklist 4.21.12,4.21.13,4.21.14,4.21.15,4.21.16,4.21.17,4.21.18,4.21.19,4.21.20,4.21.21,4.21.22 -simulate

Disks would be added to aggregate "aggr_ssd" on node "Cluster_node1" in the following manner:

First Plex

RAID Group rg0, 22 disks (block checksum, raid_dp)
Usable Physical
Position Disk Type Size Size
---------- ------------------------- ---------- -------- --------
data 1.31.12 SSD 3.49TB 3.49TB
data 1.31.13 SSD 3.49TB 3.49TB
data 1.31.14 SSD 3.49TB 3.49TB
data 1.31.15 SSD 3.49TB 3.49TB
data 1.31.16 SSD 3.49TB 3.49TB
data 1.31.17 SSD 3.49TB 3.49TB
data 1.31.18 SSD 3.49TB 3.49TB
data 1.31.19 SSD 3.49TB 3.49TB
data 1.31.20 SSD 3.49TB 3.49TB
data 1.31.21 SSD 3.49TB 3.49TB
data 1.31.22 SSD 3.49TB 3.49TB

Second Plex

RAID Group rg0, 11 disks (block checksum, raid_dp)
Usable Physical
Position Disk Type Size Size
---------- ------------------------- ---------- -------- --------
data 4.21.12 SSD 3.49TB 3.49TB
data 4.21.13 SSD 3.49TB 3.49TB
data 4.21.14 SSD 3.49TB 3.49TB
data 4.21.15 SSD 3.49TB 3.49TB
data 4.21.16 SSD 3.49TB 3.49TB
data 4.21.17 SSD 3.49TB 3.49TB
data 4.21.18 SSD 3.49TB 3.49TB
data 4.21.19 SSD 3.49TB 3.49TB
data 4.21.20 SSD 3.49TB 3.49TB
data 4.21.21 SSD 3.49TB 3.49TB
data 4.21.22 SSD 3.49TB 3.49TB

Aggregate capacity available for volume use would be increased by 32.85TB.

 

Sign in to view the entire content of this KB article.

New to NetApp?

Learn more about our award-winning Support

NetApp provides no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy or reliability or serviceability of any information or recommendations provided in this publication or with respect to any results that may be obtained by the use of the information or observance of any recommendations provided herein. The information in this document is distributed AS IS and the use of this information or the implementation of any recommendations or techniques herein is a customer's responsibility and depends on the customer's ability to evaluate and integrate them into the customer's operational environment. This document and the information contained herein may be used solely in connection with the NetApp products discussed in this document.