Skip to main content
NetApp Response to Russia-Ukraine Cyber Threat
In response to the recent rise in cyber threat due to the Russian-Ukraine crisis, NetApp is actively monitoring the global security intelligence and updating our cybersecurity measures. We follow U.S. Federal Government guidance and remain on high alert. Customers are encouraged to monitor the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security (CISA) website for new information as it develops and remain on high alert.
NetApp Knowledge Base

What is the Back-to-Back (B2B) Consistency Point Scenario?

Last Updated:

Applies to

  • ONTAP 9
  • Data ONTAP 8
  • Data ONTAP 7


For more information, see this KB: Write Performance Impacted by Back to Back Consistency Points

  • A NetApp Storage Controller has two buffers for accepting and logging write data.
  • The Storage Controller can only process one Consistency Point (CP) per Aggregate at a time due to this buffered writing scenario.
  • Under certain circumstances, while one CP is being processed and written to disk, the second memory buffer can reach a watermark that triggers a new CP prior to the previous CP being completed.
  • Since the Consistency Point process is global per aggregate (meaning ALL writes for that aggregate flow through this mechanism), and atomic (meaning all changed data that is part of the CP must be committed to disk in order to complete it), a Storage Controller in this situation must momentarily delay acknowledging ALL incoming write data requests until the previous CP is completed and the corresponding Non-Volatile RAM (NVRAM) and local memory buffers are cleared.
  • In most instances of this specific scenario, the time at which the storage controller must pause incoming write requests is measured in milliseconds, and the environment is not significantly impacted.
    • However, on storage controllers that fall into one or both of the categories below, the impact on overall performance might be undesirable.

Additional Information



Scan to view the article on your device